Naked URL as Anchor Text
Links that use the raw URL as anchor text (https://example.com) are hard to read and give Google no keyword signal for the target.
Why it matters
Links that use the raw URL as anchor text (https://example.com) are hard to read and give Google no keyword signal for the target.
Address when convenient — notices usually mark a polish opportunity rather than a defect. Estimated SEO impact: low — small marginal improvement, but cheap to fix.
How to fix
- Use descriptive anchor text instead of the URL itself
- Reserve naked URLs for footnotes or print stylesheets
Common causes
If the rule is firing across many pages, the root cause is almost always one of these:
- Old anchor text ("click here", "read more") survives template refactors.
- Migration changes URLs but leaves internal links pointing at the old paths.
- Footer or sidebar widgets reference removed pages that haven't been re-pruned.
- Generated category/tag pages create orphaned link clusters.
Anti-patterns to avoid
Even with the best intentions, these "fixes" make the issue worse — recognise them so you don't ship them:
- Anchor text "click here" / "read more" / "this link".
- Linking the same anchor to multiple destinations within one page.
- Hiding important internal links behind
onclickhandlers without anhref.
How atlookup detects this
Our crawler renders each page with a real headless browser, then normalises every internal href, follows redirects, and grades anchor descriptiveness. Pages where the rule fires for naked url as anchor text are flagged on the report.
If you'd like to see this rule fire on your own site, run a free 60-second audit — every page is reported with the exact lines that triggered it.
Tools to verify the fix
Once you've applied the fix, double-check with these external validators:
- Screaming Frog — Site-wide link audit.
- Google Search Console — Sees Google's view of internal linking.
Frequently asked questions
Why does Naked URL as Anchor Text matter for SEO?
Links that use the raw URL as anchor text (https://example.com) are hard to read and give Google no keyword signal for the target.
How do I fix naked url as anchor text?
Use descriptive anchor text instead of the URL itself Reserve naked URLs for footnotes or print stylesheets
Is this a critical SEO issue?
Address when convenient — notices usually mark a polish opportunity rather than a defect. Estimated SEO impact: low — small marginal improvement, but cheap to fix.
How does atlookup detect naked url as anchor text?
Our crawler renders each page with a real headless browser, then normalises every internal href, follows redirects, and grades anchor descriptiveness. Pages where the rule fires for naked url as anchor text are flagged on the report.
How long does it take to fix?
5–15 minutes per page. Most teams batch similar issues across templates so the per-page time goes down at scale.
Related issues
LINK_JAVASCRIPT_HREF
Link Uses javascript: URL
javascript:void(0) links are not crawlable, open in weird ways, and fail when JavaScript is disabled.
LINK_EMPTY_ANCHOR
Links with Empty Anchor Text
Links with no visible text (empty <a>, icon-only) are invisible to screen readers and give Google no anchor-text signal for the target page.
INTERNAL_LINKS_NONE
No Internal Links on Page
Pages with zero internal links are orphans in the site structure — Google has no way to discover related pages, and PageRank cannot flow to them.
LINK_GENERIC_ANCHOR
Generic Link Anchor Text
Anchor text like "click here", "read more", "learn more" provides no context — both users and Google miss what the link is about.